The Ebenezer Christian Relief Initiative (ECRI) has openly rejected the federal government's proposed pilot ranching programme in Benue State, asserting that the region has no available land to spare for the initiative. Speaking in Makurdi, ECRI Chairman Rev. Dr Augustine Leva called on federal authorities to shift their focus toward securing the safe return of Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) to their native communities rather than pushing livestock policies.
What are the key demands of the organisation?
During a press briefing, Leva—a former chairman of the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) in Benue State—argued that the state already operates under a strict legal framework prohibiting open grazing. He emphasised that any agricultural or livestock management policy introduced by the federal administration must fully respect existing state legislation, indigenous land rights, and the safety of agrarian populations. According to Leva, ranching schemes should never be forced on citizens without thorough and genuine dialogue involving the state government, traditional rulers, farming communities, and local stakeholders.
Why does the group claim there is no land?
ECRI highlighted that prolonged insecurity across rural districts has displaced numerous families, forcing them into harsh conditions within various IDP camps and host communities. Leva reiterated that Governor Hyacinth Alia had previously made it clear during a state-wide tour that Benue possessed no vacant land suitable for pilot ranching. The cleric encouraged the governor to stand firm in safeguarding local interests while pursuing lawful avenues for peace and regional development.
What other concerns were raised by ECRI?
Beyond opposing the ranching proposal, the faith-based group expressed deep concern over alleged discrepancies between official casualty figures reported by security agencies and accounts given by eyewitnesses following community attacks. ECRI maintained that transparent and accurate reporting is vital for public trust, accountability, and securing justice for victims. The organisation concluded by appealing for greater unity among traditional institutions, security outfits, religious bodies, and community leaders to protect indigenous territories from external aggressors.