On Monday, the Sokoto State Government sealed the Sokoto office of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) after a review of land records showed the premises remain the legal property of the now‑defunct Savannah Bank, and while the state awaits a response from the Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC).
What triggered the closure?
The move was announced by the Commissioner for Lands and Housing, Barrister Nasiru Dantsoho, who said the decision was taken to protect lives and property following a recent disturbance involving ADC supporters and unidentified miscreants.
Which documents were examined?
Dantsoho explained that the government examined the certificate of occupancy and related paperwork, which indicated that ownership had never been transferred from Savannah Bank. No official change of title appears in the registry.
Has the NDIC been contacted?
According to the commissioner, a formal letter was sent to the NDIC – the agency that now holds custody of the former bank’s assets – requesting clarification on the current ownership status. As of the announcement, no reply had been received.
What is the government's next step?
The state decided to keep the building sealed until the NDIC provides a definitive answer. Dantsoho stressed that the seal is a preventive measure designed to stop further clashes and to safeguard both residents and the structure itself.
Who can claim the property?
The commissioner appealed to any individual or entity that believes it has a legitimate claim to the office to submit the appropriate documentation to the state for verification. Once ownership is confirmed, the property could be released to its rightful holder.
What are the legal consequences for trespassers?
Dantsoho warned that anyone attempting to force entry into the sealed premises will face prosecution and appropriate legal action under existing state laws.
Broader context
The sealing occurs against a backdrop of rising political tension in Sokoto, where recent reports have linked ADC supporters and state security operatives to a series of confrontations. The government’s action is being viewed as an effort to de‑escalate the situation while the ownership issue is resolved.