United States President Donald Trump has declared that Israel would cease to exist without Washington's extensive military backing, highlighting the critical role of American assistance in safeguarding the Middle Eastern nation. The American leader delivered these remarks during an interview on CBS's 60 Minutes, marking his initial sit-down media engagement following midterm elections that saw the Democratic Party secure victories across multiple states.
According to the President, nations under American protection are expected to reimburse the US for war-related expenditures. "Without us, they wouldn't exist. Without us, Israel would not exist," Trump stated during the broadcast, while also acknowledging voter dissatisfaction regarding ongoing conflicts and rising fuel prices alongside a notable public resistance toward Israel.
What did Trump say about Iran and nuclear materials?
Addressing the situation with Iran, Trump disclosed that Washington was on the verge of securing an agreement with Tehran prior to the midterm elections. He expressed confidence that his administration's past military actions against Iran will historically be viewed as a positive strategic move. When questioned on whether Tehran retained nuclear capabilities, the American leader asserted that their materials are completely contained beneath massive layers of rock, adding that he has no intention of escalating hostilities.
Turning to domestic political pressure and potential removal proceedings by lawmakers, Trump dismissed the likelihood of impeachment, pointing to what he described as his administration's unprecedented legislative and executive achievements during his tenure. He also addressed the political future of Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, who faces mounting calls for his removal, stating his satisfaction with his cabinet while hinting at potential minor adjustments.
Regarding energy policies and international sanctions, Trump clarified that his administration did not lift diesel restrictions on Russia, but rather facilitated the supply of substantial petroleum barrels to the global market rather than directly to the US. Congressional critics have previously condemned the oil waivers, though administration defenders maintained the measures were vital for stabilizing consumer energy costs and ensuring steady supply lines amid geopolitical tensions and disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz.