In the border regions of Katsina State, where the forests of Zamfara merge with the Republic of Niger, the responsibility for security has shifted away from the government. Instead, it is brokered through an often uneasy and sometimes violent negotiation between communities and the armed factions that operate in the area.
For years, local government areas within Katsina have been subjected to relentless attacks, including cattle rustling, mass kidnappings, and village assaults. This persistent insecurity has led to a gradual abdication of the state's fundamental duty to protect its citizens. In response, many communities have found themselves making difficult compromises, entering into fragile agreements with the very groups perpetuating the violence.
This dynamic was starkly illustrated in the Malamawa district of Jibia on a Monday evening. Residents emerged not to greet officials, but to await the return of a figure known as Abdu Lankai, a notorious bandit leader who had purportedly turned 'repentant.'
The town had been in a state of heightened anxiety for six days during Lankai's captivity by a rival faction. During this period, markets operated on reduced hours, and families remained on edge, fearful not of external attacks, but of the potential consequences of their security guarantor's absence.
This situation reflects what locals refer to as the Jibia Peace Model, a precarious security framework born out of widespread exhaustion. Under this model, communities place their trust in select bandit groups to manage and suppress the activities of other, more hostile elements.
An in-depth investigation, based on discussions with community leaders, victims, and security sector insiders, alongside a review of local media coverage, reveals how public safety in certain parts of Katsina has been delegated to an armed, non-state entity. It also sheds light on the severe repercussions faced by those who resist these arrangements.
***
The Guardian of the Passage
The current security arrangement did not stem from a deliberate policy but from sheer weariness. By 2025, some armed factions in Katsina's northwest had been significantly weakened by internal conflicts and intermittent security crackdowns. They had become depleted and sought a cessation of hostilities.
"They were tired," stated a senior official from the Miyetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association in Katsina, who requested anonymity due to security concerns. "They were under pressure from all sides. For nearly a year, they were looking for a truce."
These agreements began to spread across critical local government areas such as Batsari, Jibia, Danmusa, Faskari, and Safana. The terms were straightforward: the armed groups committed to ceasing attacks, ending cattle theft, and releasing captives without demanding ransoms. In return, communities promised safe passage for trade and pledged to advocate for the release of detained relatives of the bandits – a commitment the government has largely failed to uphold.
In Jibia, Mr. Lankai became the central figure in this pact.
Having previously operated as a bandit controlling key routes between Zamfara and the Niger Republic, Mr. Lankai transformed into the area's unofficial security chief. He enforced the truce with a degree of control, resolving disputes, thwarting raids, and monitoring access roads.
"Lankai serves as a gatekeeper," explained the Miyetti Allah source. "He prevents bandits from Zamfara from entering Jibia. He recovers stolen livestock. He enforces the prohibition of weapons in the market."
Residents reported a period of relative peace lasting nearly a year. Bashir Lawal, the general secretary of the Jibia People's Forum, acknowledged that Lankai played a "crucial role in neutralizing bandits who tried to disrupt the process."
***
The Breakdown
This semblance of peace, however, was predicated on the continued presence and influence of Mr. Lankai – that he would remain armed and unchallenged.
This fragile foundation crumbled in late January.
Disputes intensified between Mr. Lankai and the associates of Bello Turji, a notorious bandit leader from Zamfara. The conflict primarily involved Dogo Rabe, who originated from Jibia but had relocated to Zamfara, and another commander known as "Black."
Local accounts suggest the dispute was rooted in territorial control, specifically concerning Mr. Lankai's efforts to block cattle routes into Jibia. However, reports from Daily Trust also pointed to a financial motive, alleging a botched arms deal where an associate of Mr. Lankai allegedly received ₦100 million without delivering the weapons.
Regardless of whether the conflict was territorial or financial, the incident exposed the inherent vulnerability of the peace model: stability faltered the moment financial and arms dealings re-entered the equation.
On January 27, a meeting arranged for reconciliation took a violent turn. Mr. Lankai attended with eight men, but they were separated from him under the pretext of hospitality. Gunfire erupted, resulting in the deaths of seven of his men, and Mr. Lankai was taken captive by Mr. Turji's group.
"They seized everything," a source with knowledge of the event stated. "The proceeds from his cattle sales. His weapons."
An audio message later disseminated by Katsina Times confirmed Mr. Lankai's capture and cautioned the public to remain uninvolved in the conflict.
***
Fear Without the Gatekeeper
Mr. Lankai's abduction plunged Jibia into widespread fear. Markets closed prematurely, and residents fortified their homes. Whispers of his execution began to circulate.
For six days, the prevailing anxiety was not about impending violence, but about the potential loss of the individual who had been holding it at bay.
On February 2, Mr. Lankai reappeared following his release. His return was met with large gatherings in the Malamawa district, underscoring the extent to which public safety had become reliant on a single armed intermediary.
He returned alive, but notably disarmed and with diminished authority.
***
The Repercussions of Defiance: The Doma Massacre
While Jibia celebrated the return of its security figure, the town of Doma, situated within the Faskari-Kankara corridor, provided a grim counterpoint.
Unlike Jibia, Doma and its adjacent settlement, Doma B, reportedly refused any peace agreement with armed groups, opting instead to trust in the Nigerian state for protection.
Following reports of a bandit's corpse being discovered near the town – an allegation residents deny – an armed group numbering over 30 motorcycles descended upon Doma and Doma Biyu last Tuesday afternoon.
"They were not there to negotiate," said Sama’ila Doma. "They came to exact retribution."
By the time the attackers departed, at least 20 people had been killed in Doma A and B.
Among the deceased was Muhammadu Sagiru, a 35-year-old driver who had recently transported politicians to a rally in Katsina and was preparing to travel for a wedding. His elder brother, Ahmadu Sagiru, told PREMIUM TIMES, "When we called his phone later, someone else answered. He told us, 'We have killed him.'"
Residents reported that security forces only arrived hours after the attackers had left, and no sustained security presence was subsequently established.
***
The State's Absence
The massacre in Doma and the scenes of celebration in Jibia share a critical commonality: the conspicuous absence of the state in both scenarios.
In Doma, locals claim that soldiers only appeared after the perpetrators had already retreated.
"The aircraft arrived two hours later," Mr. Ahmadu recounted. "When the soldiers finally got here, they were asking us for directions."
Elsewhere, an informal order has taken root, operating outside the purview of established law. In Batsari, illegal gold mining is reportedly continuing under the supervision of local power brokers and armed actors, rather than state regulatory bodies.
"It's illegal mining," acknowledged a source speaking anonymously, "but it is peaceful."
***
A State-less Model
What is unfolding in Katsina is not genuine peace but rather a delegation of violence management. Communities are confronted with a harsh choice: either accept the protection offered by armed intermediaries or face unchecked violence with little assurance of state intervention.
Security analyst Yahuza Getso has cautioned that such arrangements are inherently unstable. He pointed out that without disarmament, individuals acting as peace enforcers remain armed actors who can easily revert to violence at any moment.
Nevertheless, some local leaders contend that stability, however compromised, is preferable to widespread killing. One proposal put forth in Batsari suggests the establishment of integrated boarding schools where the children of bandits and villagers would reside and learn together.
The underlying rationale is straightforward: if armed actors have familial ties within a community, the likelihood of them resorting to violence diminishes.
The implications of this strategy are profoundly concerning, as children effectively become leverage – human pawns in a conflict where the state no longer guarantees their safety.
For now, Jibia can rest, not because the border is secure, but because its bandit 'gatekeeper' has returned.
Comments (0)
You must be logged in to comment.
Be the first to comment on this article!